David Webber, Columbia MISSOURIAN, October 20, 2023
I knew Hank Waters.
I am no Hank Waters.
I miss Hank and the function he served in the Columbia community. He was the publisher of Columbia’s other local paper, the Columbia Daily Tribune, and authored a signed daily opinion essay, titled “Hank’s View,” for more than 40 years. I wrote about his life in 2021, so I won’t review it again here.
Times have changed and no one can fill his shoes or his editorial space. We are worse off without him.
He had a breadth and depth of knowledge about Columbia and Missouri politics, society and life that few people accumulate over their years on earth.
He also had a vantage point as publisher of a local paper and a business owner that gave him a legitimacy, an authority and an opportunity to observe much of Columbia’s business and governing community up close and personally.
I never felt obliged to agree with him, but I sure considered his point of view.
As I wrote then, I only knew the public Hank Waters. I never had a coffee or beer with him. I talked with him in his office three times that I remember and at public events at least three times.
I wrote for his Tribune for several years, so he knew my name. In hindsight, I wish I had used that opportunity to learn about his writing habits, spied on his local community interactions and studied his political views.
I always found him to be thoughtful, pleasant and open to other perspectives. My views on Hank are reinforced by Michael Davis, who wrote a 2013 master’s thesis in journalism, “Editorial Personality: Factors that make editorial writers successful.”
Davis found that a majority of the 19 self-identified readers he surveyed thought Hank’s editorials were fair and that he did a good job of giving “the other side” of issues he addressed. Readers described Hank as “intelligent,” well-informed,” a “good person,” “folks,” curmudgeonly” and “warm.’
Just having Hank’s presence in Columbia affected and, I suspect, improved city governance. I don’t know how much of his time he spent preparing to write his opinion pieces, but I know he aimed to meet and speak to local candidates before the elections.
As a failed School Board candidate, myself, I recall my fellow candidates in 2001 talking about their upcoming meetings with Hank and anticipating what questions he might ask.
There is a long list of recent and current issues about which I want Hank-type analysis and opinion. Let’s start with what took city leaders so long to make a decision on roll carts, and was it a good decision to overturn the vote of citizens?
Same with the city’s and Boone County’s use of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds. Why the city’s long and closed process?
The City Council has seen a major turnover in the past two elections with few, perhaps no, non-self-interested observers keeping an eye on city business. There will soon be a vacancy in the Second Ward because Andrea Waner is moving out of the ward.
There is currently an effort to recall newly-elected First Ward Councilmember Nick Knoth because of a possible conflict of interest.
Yes, there are immediate print and TV media reports, but there is seldom experienced observation and comment — and almost never follow-up.
Columbia is currently in the process of hiring a police chief and has held several types of meetings in the past three months. I applauded those efforts and knew they were taking place, but I feel I need more.
This week I attended the crowded public forum of the final four police chief candidates who were, out of fairness, asked the identical questions, and we heard, out of risk avoidance, nearly identical soothing answers.
Yes, we need community collaboration with the police. Yes, we need co-responders of social workers with police to 911 emergency calls. Yes, Columbia is a great place to live. I learned that CALEA — the Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies — is the “gold standard for police department performance.” The candidates seemed to be following the same script. I don’t have much useful feedback for the search committee and the city manager. Hank would have.
This newspaper reported a basic review of the event but not enough to help the reader judge the competency of the candidates.
I applaud and appreciate Columbia’s public forums and surveys, but I miss not having a thoughtful experienced reaction from someone who recalls how other police chiefs were selected. Someone like Hank, who I think would have talked and listened to some of the attendees of this summer’s police chief forum and to some other folks around town before he wrote “Hank’s View.” In the gold ole days of yesteryear, it seems that kind of local intelligence was more common.
An under-appreciated function Hank served was community building. In the days of the afternoon-printed Tribune, you knew if you attended an evening policy forum or political event that others attending had already read “Hank’s View,” too.
David Webber joined the MU Political Science Department in 1986 and wrote his first column for the Missourian in 1994.